Why Did the Gallipoli Campaign Fail?

The bunk ended in misery for several(prenominal) reasons. It was non the fault of the soldiers, but the workforce who where commanding them. For once there was a break down in our system. In brief, the campaign was a failure. It was a failure as we did not successfully free energy through the Turkish lines to Istanbul, and then on to attack the Germans on another social movement to help the Russians who were suffering heavy causualties at the time. So, heres why we retreated * Second thoughts in Parliament worth the casualties Supply lines were not working. Men did not get bountiful stuff * No one knew how to do an amphibious assault we just rowed to brink * Lack of Leadership General in charge changed, forces were not allowed to do anything with step to the fore influences. When an order was given it would have to be carried out to the letter as it was from the British officers. No matter what. The orders were sometimes days old. * The Generals in addition had barely any k nowledge of Turk play and the like.Their knowledge was very limited, consisting of things like a 1912 manual of Turk tactics, a tourist guidebook and an outdated map. * No additional military man allowed parliamentay decision * Royal Navy withdraws No pressure on Turk capital, army artillery unit support gone * Turks had the high motive (really high ground) * No one wide-awake for modern warfare just ran against a machine gun, men shooting with gobble action rifles and pistols * Terrain very difficult ocean mine-sweeps were poor. * A months delay between the attacks in March and those in April it gace the Turkish/ quilt troops plenty of time to limit and fortify. Kitchener depended on the element of surprise, but because of this he only gained Tactical surprise when and where he would strike, not if he would strike. Also, throw in the low morale of the troops referable to the above factors, and also due to diseases much(prenominal) as dysentery and malaria