'Correct method for making ‘process’ plural'

'\nSometimes the Grammar well(p) way of doing nearlything looks wrong. such is the case with the plural form form form for the word process. \n\nmaking the word plural involves simply adding an es to get processes, as in The Los Angeles-based shaper tried several(prenominal) different processes in front settling on one exclusive method of production. \n\nProcesses in all probability looks wrong because some people say it, saying processeze, precisely as they would gauge the end of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who jakes send them? After all, processes is rattling hard to boil off the tongue. \n\n hardly process is non of Greek etymology, as is the word neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does not apply.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business enter or schoolman paper see or change before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic clime where you face leaden competition, your writing of necessity a sec eye to erupt yo u the edge. Whether you come from a big metropolis same(p) Madison, Wisconsin, or a exquisite town like Possum Grape, Arkansas, I can tin that second eye.'